- Author Unknown -
The CRU have also been accused of ‘bad science’, yet many of the reported scandals that have fuelled Global Warming scepticism broke around the time of COP 15 when the world’s nations were trying to seek a deal on global emissions. Not surprising really.
The problem is that climate change is a hot political issue. In the USA in 2009, the Center for Public Integrity detailed the massive expansion in lobbying by polluting energy interests, leading to over 1,150 groups buying influence as the U.S. Congress sought to pass the Waxman-Markey climate bill. The actual dollar amount spent is unknown, as disclosure laws require few details, but the Center calculated that an extremely conservative estimate would give a minimum figure of more than US$27 million spent in direct lobbying from April to June 2009.
My personal position is that the degree to which we are warming the Earth is still unknown but that it is to such a significant degree that it requires us to act immediately. Not knowing the exact percentage of temperature increases doesn't mean we can sit back and continue to pump the Earth's atmosphere with carbon dioxide. That really is understatement!
Here is some climate change data from NASA and the Royal Society – both not known for their radical politics.
* 2009 tied as the second warmest year on record and the warmest since records began in the Southern Hemisphere.
* The greenhouse gas, carbon dioxide (CO2) has risen by 30% since pre-industrial times (300 years).
This is 10 times larger than any fluctuation in the past 600,000 years. Therefore the current rise is almost certainly due to human activity.
* Increasing atmospheric CO2 also leads to ocean acidification which risks profound impacts on many marine ecosystems and in turn the societies which depend on them.
* Whilst the extent of climate change is often expressed in a single figure – global temperature – the effects of climate change (such as temperature, precipitation and the frequency of extreme weather events) will vary greatly from place to place.
I could say a lot more but the editor of the local rag gave me just 500 words and I did not feel it would be effective to terrify the local populus. Understatement seemed best at that juncture.

Peak Uranium & Peak Oil
As for fuel resources peaking (I continued, imagining the local pro-nuclear lobby on my back), we know that uranium is a scarce resource – its supply is estimated to last only for the next 30 to 60 years depending on the actual demand. Geologists working for the oil exploration industry also agree that the supply of oil has peaked (probably around 2004). We drive our society with fossil fuels and uranium and scientific consensus agrees that these resources are running out.

“What Kind of World Do We Want?”
This to me is the crux of the question. Do we want a biosphere polluted by chemicals with power generated by CO2 emitting coal, or nuclear devices that create waste that must be buried for 1,000 years in a geological safe repository? Of course not. Most of us care deeply for the planet and realise there that we cannot continue to ravage forests, dump toxic waste and indefinitely burn fossil fuels. We need to hear more about practical solutions and creatively explore better ways of living and working. That is why I have devoted 20 years of my life to publishing solution-orientated information, even at times when it seemed the world wasn't very interested.
My joy, however, comes from actually applying that knowledge – growing food, transforming waste into fertility, heating water with the sun, establishing biodiverse habitats, encouraging rare species into my garden, working with others to set up community-based projects... Best of all, learning to work in a team and nurturing each others' creativity and commitment to this vision of a better world. Co-operation is a greatest form of human endeavour.
Really we should be shouting from the rooftops about the dangers of climate change and the devastation of the world. Instead we are somewhat genteely trying to counter vested interest and scepticism with well argued debate and sensible alternatives. It is a mad situation but I cannot see what else to do to get through this maze born of human ignorance. I hope one day we all look back and say we not only tried our best, we succeeded. Until then, we keep dancing.

Maddy Harland is editor of Permaculture Magazine - inspiration for sustainable living. To read free copies of of the magazine click here.



